Development and Testing of Instrument to Assess Preterm Infant Care Practice in Neonatal Care Units

  • Tumla Shrestha Maharajgunj Nursing Campus, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-1286
  • Archana Pandey Bista Maharajgunj Nursing Campus, Tribhuvan University Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal
Keywords: Development and testing of instrument, Preterm infant care practice, Nurses, Neonatal care unit, Tools for Infant Care, Tools for Infant Care Practice

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants (PTIs) are vulnerable to morbidity, mortality, disability. They require special treatment and care in neonatal care units (NCUs) for survival and developmental potential. Nurses have the significant responsibility for providing quality care to these infants. To find out the care status, it is necessary to have a valid and reliable instrument.
Objective: The study was conducted to develop and test an instrument to assess PTI care practice by nurses in NCUs.
Methods: The instrument was developed based on literature review and the finding of the focus group discussion (FGD). The instrument was developed in August 2020 and pretested among 30 nurses working in NCUs of two private teaching hospitals of Kathmandu during September 2020. Measures were used to ensure the validity of the instrument. The content validity index (CVI) scores for items and scale were calculated from the scores given by the eight experts. The Cronbach alpha (α) was calculated considering the acceptable α-value > 0.7.
Results: The instrument having four domains, 47 items and 5 sub-items was developed to assess PTI care practice. The instrument had a satisfactory CVI score for each item (>0.75) and overall scale (>0.9). The Cronbach alpha value for the subscales were between 0.79 and 0.88 and the overall scale was >0.93.
Conclusion: The instrument to assess preterm infant care practice provided by nurses in NCU was developed with adequate theoretical and contextual background. Necessary validity and reliability processes and criteria were also employed. Therefore, the instrument might be useful to assess the PTI care practice of nurses in NCUs in Nepalese context.

References

Blencowe H, Cousens S, Chou D, Oestergaard M, Say L, Moller A-B, et al. Born Too Soon: The global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod Health. 2013;10(1):S2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S2 [Pubmed]

US Agency for International Development , Nepal. Maternal and Child Survival Program. ale EP. Profile of Preterm and Low Birth Weight Prevention and Care. 2019; 2. [Reliefweb Everypreemie]

Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee ACC, Waiswa P, et al. Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7 [Pubmed] [The Lancet]

Glass HC, Costarino AT, Stayer SA, Brett CM, Cladis F, Davis PJ. Outcomes for extremely premature infants. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jun;120(6):1337–51. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000705 [PMC] [Pubmed]

WHO. Survive & thrive:Transforming care for every small and sick newborn. Vol. 29, WHO, UNICEF. 2019. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/326495/9789241515887-eng.pdf

WHO. WHO recommendations on interventions to improve preterm birth outcomes. 2015. Available from: www.who.int/reproductivehealth

Lockridge T, Neonatal Neuroprotection: Bringing Best Practice to the Bedside in the NICU. MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing, 2018.43(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000000411. [Pubmed]

Griffiths N, Spence K, Loughran-Fowlds A, & Westru, B. Individualised developmental care for babies and parents in the NICU: Evidence-based best practice guideline recommendations. Early Human Development. 201). 139, 104840. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.104840. [pubmed] [Sciencedirect] [semantic scholar]

WHO World Health Organization. Guidelines on optimal feeding of low birth-weight infants in low-and middle-income countries. Geneva WHO. 2011;16–45. [WHO] [NCBI]

Ministry of Health and Population G of N. National Neonatal Clinical Protocol. Kathmandu Nepal; 2016.

Altimier L, Phillips R. The Neonatal Integrative Developmental Care Model: Advanced Clinical Applications of the Seven Core Measures for Neuroprotective Family-centered Developmental Care. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2016;16(4):230–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.nainr.2016.09.030 [ScienceDirect] [Semantic Scholar]

Coughlin M, Gibbins S, Hoath S. Core measures for developmentally supportive care in neonatal intensive care units: theory, precedence and practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2009;65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05052.x. [Pubmed][PMC]

Moxon SG, Lawn JE, Dickson KE, Simen-Kapeu A, Gupta G, Deorari A, et al. Inpatient care of small and sick newborns: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(2):S7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-15-S2-S7 [BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth]

Dickson KE, Simen-Kapeu A, & Kinney MV. Every Newborn: Health-systems bottlenecks and strategies to accelerate scale-up in countries. The Lancet. 2014. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60582-1[pubmed] [THE LANCET] [Europe PMC]

New K, Durairaj A, Robb-McCord J, Khadka N. Nurturing care for small and sick newborns: evidence review and country case studies. 2019; USAID. [Healthy Newborn Network]

Minstry of Health and Population (MoHP). Nepal’s Every Newborn Action Plan. 2016;90.

El-Sayed Mohammed R, Maher Khamis G, Youssef Sabry Y. Effect of Preterm Neonates’ Developmental Supportive Care Program on Nurses’ Performance. 2018;7(4):33–45. https://doi:10.9790/1959-0704053345. [IOSR Journal]

Valizadeh L, Asadollahi M, Mostafa Gharehbaghi M, Gholami F. The Congruence of Nurses’ Performance with Developmental Care Standards in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. J. of caring sciences. 2013; 2:61-71. https://doi.org/10.5681/jcs.2013.008. [PMC]

Soleimani F, Torkzahrani S, Rafiey H, Salavati M, Nasiri M. Development and psychometric testing of a scale for the assessment of the quality of developmental care in neonatal intensive care units in Iran. Electronic physician. 2016; 8(1): 1686-92.

https://doi.org/10.19082/1686. [PMC]

Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health. 2018;6(149). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. [Frontiers][Pubmed]

Polit DF and Beck, CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidencce for Nursing Practice. 10th ed. Wolters Kluwer IndiaPvt. Ltd, New Delhi; 2018. 331 to 355.

Vakili MM, Jahangiri N. Content Validity and Reliability of the Measurement Tools in Educational, Behavioral, and Health Sciences Research. Journal of Medical Education Dev. 2018;10(28):106–18. [edujournal]

Barman N, Khanikor MS. Content validity of a structured tool: knowledge questionnaire on behavioural problems. Open Journal of Psychiatry Allied Sci. 2019;10(2):146. [Academia Publisher]

Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar A-R. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. Journal of Caring Sci. 2015 1;4(2):165–78. [Pubmed]

Polit D, Beck C. The Content Validity Index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct 1;29:489–97.

Perneger T, Courvoisier D, Hudelson P, Gayet-Ageron A. Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires. Quality of Life Research. 2014 Jul 10;24. [Springerlink]

Taherdoost H. Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument ; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire. Int J Acad Res Manag. 2016;5(3):28–36.

Heale R, Twycross A. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18(3):66–7. (BMJ journals)

Harpe SE. How to analyze Likert and other rating scale data. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2015;7(6):836–50. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2015.08.001 [Sciencedirect]

Konapur A, Krishnapillai MN, Nagalla B, Gavaravarapu SM. A sequential, exploratory, mixed-methods approach for development and validation of a context-specific knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire on micronutrients for literate mothers of school-age children. Public Health Nutr. 2019;22(11):2120–31.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark VLP. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. California, U. S. A.: Sage Publication Ltd.; 2011. 188–192 p.

Soleimani F., Torkzahrani, S, Rafiey, H., Salavati,M and Nasiri M. Iran J Pediatr. Assessing Factors Influencing the Quality of Developmental Care in Neonatal Intensive Care Units of Tehran. 2017 February; 27(1):e6733 doi: 10.5812/ijp.6733. [Semantic Scholar] [knowsar]

Colbert CY, French JC, Arroliga AC, Bierer SB. Best practice versus actual practice: an audit of survey pretesting practices reported in a sample of medical education journals. Med Educ Online. 20191;24(1):1673596. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1673596 [NCBI, PMC]

Published
2021-08-28
How to Cite
1.
Shrestha T, Pandey Bista A. Development and Testing of Instrument to Assess Preterm Infant Care Practice in Neonatal Care Units. Europasian J Med Sci. [Internet]. 2021Aug.28 [cited 2024May13];3(2):35-2. Available from: https://www.europasianjournals.org/ejms/index.php/ejms/article/view/260