Diaphyseal Femur Fracture in Paediatric Age group: Outcome with fixation by Elastic Nailing System
Abstract
Background: Diaphyseal femur fracture in paediatric age group account for 1.6% of all paediatric fractures. Fracture fixation by elastic nail provides three point fixation. This study aims to assess the outcome of diaphyseal femur fracture in paediatric age group from 5 to 15 years treated with titanium elastic nailing system.
Methods: Thirty six patients with diaphyseal femur fracture were treated with titanium elastic nailing system from November 2018 to August 2020 was analyzed prospectively. All the patients were followed up for six months for the study. Final outcome was evaluated at six months.
Results: The mean time of fracture union was 9.12 weeks. Two patients had limb lengthening of 6 mm and 8 mm respectively. One patient had 1 cm of shortening and 8 degree of varus angulation and 9 patients had bursitis over nail insertion site. According to Flynn grading 26 cases have excellent results (72.22%) and 10 cases have satisfactory results (27.78%).
Conclusion: Diaphyseal femur fracture can be treated with elastic nailing system with early mobilization and good functional outcomes.
Keywords: Diaphyseal femur fracture, Elastic nail, Fracture union, Titanium elastic nailing system
References
Von Heideken J, Svensson T, Blomqvist P, HaglundÅkerlind Y, Janarv PM. Incidence and trends in femur shaft fractures in Swedish children between 1987 and 2005. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2011;31(5):512-9. 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31821f9027 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Carey TP, Galpin RD. Flexible intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;332:110-118. 10.1097/00003086-199611000-00015 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Kregor PJ, Song KM, Routt Jr ML, et al. Plate fixation of femoral shaft fractures in multiply injured children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1774-1780. 10.2106/00004623-199312000-00006 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Beaty JH, Austin SM, Warner WC, et al. Interlocking intramedullary nailing of femoral-shaft fractures in adolescents: preliminary results and complications. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:178-183. 10.1097/01241398-199403000-00009 [Google Scholar] [Full Text]
Canale ST. Fracture and dislocation in children. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, eds. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2007: 1651-1661. [Google Scholar]
Heinrich SD, Drvaric DM, Darr K, et al. The operative stabilization of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures with flexible intramedullary nails: a prospective analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:501-507. 10.1097/01241398-199407000-00016 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Fein LH, Pankovich AM, Spero CM, et al. Closed flexible intramedullary nailing of adolescent femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3:133-141.10.1097/00005131-198906000-00008 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Kissel EU, Miller ME. Closed-ended nailing of femur fractures in older children. J Trauma. 1989;29:1585-1588. 10.1097/00005373-198911000-00020 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Mann DC, Weddington J, Davenport K. Closed Ender nailing of femoral shaft fractures in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6:651-655. 10.1097/01241398-198611000-00002 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Greisberg J, Bliss MJ, Eberson CP. Social and economic benefits of flexible intramedullary nails in the treatment of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. Orthopedics. 2002;25:1067-1070. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-20021001-18 [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Full Text]
Flynn JM, Heresko T, Reynolds RA, Blasier RD, Davidson R, Kasser J. Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: a multicenter study of early results with analysis of complications. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(1):4-6. 10.1097/00004694-200101000-00003 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Huber RI, Keller HW, Huber PM, Rehm KE. Flexible intramedullary nailing as fracture treatment in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;16(5):602-5. 10.1097/00004694-199609000-00011 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Staheli L, Sheridan G. Early spica cast management of femoral shaft fractures in young children. A technique utilizing bilateral fixed skin traction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;126:162-166. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Pankovich AM, Goldflies ML, Pearson RL. Closed Ender nailing of femoral-shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61:222-232. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Ligier JN, Metaizeau JP, Prevot J, Lascombes P. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1988; 70-B:74-77. 10.1302/0301-620X.70B1.3339064 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Gamal El-Adl, Mohamed F, Mostsfa A Khalil, Ahmed Enan. Titanium elastic nail fixation for pediatric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop. Belg. 2009; 75:512-520. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Full Text]
Reeves RB, Ballard RI, Hughes JL. Internal fixation versus traction and casting of adolescent femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10:592-595. 10.1097/01241398-199009000-00004 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Sink EL, Hedequist D, Morgan SJ. Results and technique of unstable pediatric femoral fractures treated with submuscular bridge plating. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006;26:177-181. 10.1097/01.bpo.0000218524.90620.34 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Cramer KE, Tornetta P, Spero CR. Ender rod fixation of femoral shaft fractures in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;376:119-123. 10.1097/00003086-200007000-00017 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Shapiro F. Fractures of the femoral shaft in children: the overgrowth phenomenon. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52:649-655. 10.3109/17453678108992162 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Wallace ME, Hoffman EB. Remodeling of angular deformity after femoral shaft fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74:765-769. 10.1302/0301-620X.74B5.1527131 [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
KC KM, RC DR, Acharya P. Pediatric femoral shaft fractures treated by flexible intramedullary nailing. Chinese Journal of Traumatology 18 (2015) 284-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.05.002 [Google Scholar] [Full Text]
Copyright (c) 2021 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author(s) retain the ownership of the copyrights for their work published in EJMS without any restrictions. Upon submission, the author(s) grants EJMS a license to publish, including to display, store, copy, and reuse the published content.
License to Publish
By submitting a manuscript to EJMS, the author(s) grant the journal a non-exclusive license to:
- Publish and distribute the content in all formats, media, and platforms (both existing and future), while identifying EJMS as the original publisher.
- Reproduce, display, and store the content in both print and online formats, including institutional and digital repositories.
- Translate, adapt, and summarize the work, including reprints, extracts, and abstracts.
- Develop derivative works based on the original content.
- Include the work in electronic databases and provide links to third-party materials.
Creative Commons Licensing
In addition to EJMS’s publishing rights, authors grant third parties the right to use, share, and distribute their work under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License. This allows unrestricted use of the content, provided proper attribution is given to the original author(s) and the journal.